16
?
it, to bring in their own
long
promised and more comprehensive
+
measure
which if satisfactory
and thorough.
may
take the
place of the present Bill, should
the objections urged against
the latter be found in its
orking
to have the importance.
mclaure &
タ
667
Keswick and Mr. Belilios and
the only apparently good a
argument against it viz, that
in
it is an advance
advance of
Home
Legislation has been well
answered by Mr. Bel rios in
his letter of which I append.
5th June, 1891
a
copy, and also
Jained
for
them
by
its opponents.
My
own conviction
is that this measure is urgently
required. It is strongly supported
by
some of the leading
mercantile men, such as Mr.
Keswick
by
Mr
Ackroyd who in his minute,
copy of which was sent to your Lordship by Mr. Fleming,
wrote as
follows:.
"The argument that
because the law does not exist.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.